A typical expression of individualism making its appearance in the Archaic period is the declaration of his identity by the artist in his work. These signatures, particularly well-known from the ceramic vessels of the time and possible thanks to the rediscovery of writing, take the two forms egraphsen and epoiesen; or when the vessel speaks as if in person: m'egraphsen kai m'epoiesen. The first indicates the painter who painted the vessel; the second, the potter who made it. Thanks to the developed self-evaluation and pride of various artists, various masterpieces of Attic vase-painting emerge from obscurity; at the same time, we have the opportunity to get information about the organization and functioning of the workshops of classical Athens. Thus such names have come down to us as: Sophilus, Clitias, Ergotimus, Lydus, Amasis, Exekias, Nicosthenes, and Euphronius.




Not only potters, but sculptors and workers in bronze also signed their pieces. To the latter belong, for example, Chalcodamas, Coeus, and Aristodicus. From as early as the 7th century survive signatures such as that of Euthycratides, who dedicated his work to Delian Apollo. In around 600 B.C., the sculptor of the statues of Cleobis and Biton at Delphi felt sufficiently proud to declare his name (which unfortunately survives only fragmentarily). The signature on a work was connected more with the desire of the artist to stress his special personal achievement than with the quality and uniqueness of that achievement. This is why works of lesser importance also bear signatures, while genuine masterpieces are unsigned.


Private people, too, did not miss the opportunity to declare their name, by means of another custom connected with dedication at temples. The sculptures, the works in bronze, and ceramics that were dedicated both at the great Panhellenic shrines and at small local shrines often mentioned the name of the donor, sometimes also accompanied by a request to the god. Inscriptions of formal dedication usually contain the phrase anetheke or m'anetheke.


In the literature of the time, the creator as individual went beyond the tradition of a simple invocation to the Muses, and did not hesitate to refer extensively to autobiographical elements, subjective judgments, and personal feelings. Hesiod complained about the lack of control over power (Works and Days 34-41, 174-179, 263-266); Solon referred with genuine pride to all he had done to lighten the lot of the poor and weak (Elegeia 5-6, Iamboi 36); Sappho hymned her loves (Diehl 40-41, 48, 50, 114, 137); and Archilochus bewailed the fate that took him as colonist to Thasos (frag. 20, 21A, 52, 103). Through lyric poetry, the use of the first person lent to the 'I' the confidence befitting a model of universal range, able to advance the specific and subjective to an equivalent and a rival of the general and the socially well-established.


| introduction | structures | law | values | Archaic Period

Note: Click on a picture for a brief description.